Bureau Hours: Wednesdays, 6:00am – 7:00am
Closed on holidays, near-holidays, and days following holidays.
The Bureau observes all federal, provincial, and self-declared holidays.
The American Society of Scale Model Rebuttal Bureau hereby classifies the 2013 Fiat 500e under Docket Reference EV-43-FIAT-001, designating it a Tier II Collectible of Moderate Historical Significance and Disproportionate Bureaucratic Interest. Any citizen disputing this classification may file Form 77-C, which will be reviewed at the Bureau's convenience, currently estimated at no earlier than 2031.
The Fiat 500e was introduced for the 2013 model year as a fully electric variant of the third-generation Fiat 500, itself a 2007 revival of the iconic 1957 original. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles developed it primarily for sale in California, where zero-emission vehicle mandates required manufacturers to produce and sell compliant models or face financial penalties.
Sergio Marchionne, then-CEO of Fiat Chrysler, famously stated in 2012 that the company lost approximately $10,000 on every 500e sold, and publicly asked customers not to buy it. This remains one of the more candid product launches in automotive history and has done nothing to reduce the car's cult following.
The 500e was powered by a 83 kW (111 hp) electric motor paired with a 24 kWh lithium-ion battery pack, producing an EPA-rated range of approximately 87 miles per charge. It used a modified version of the standard 500 platform, with the battery pack occupying the space formerly used by the fuel tank and a portion of the rear cargo area.
Production ran from 2013 through 2019 for the first generation, sold exclusively in California and Oregon. A second-generation 500e built on an entirely new platform was unveiled in Europe in 2020, though this guide concerns only the original 2013 variant, as the Bureau does not recognize vehicles it has not yet filed paperwork for.
The 2013 500e was offered in a single body style — the three-door hatchback — with no convertible or Abarth variant made available in electric form during the first generation. Special editions included the "500e by Gucci" concept shown at the 2012 Los Angeles Auto Show, which the Bureau acknowledges as aesthetically aggressive and officially outside our jurisdiction.
Norev, the French manufacturer with a long history of producing European city cars in 1:43, released a 500e in this scale, capturing the distinctive rounded bodywork with commendable accuracy. Their casting renders the contrast roof color options faithfully, which the Bureau considers the minimum acceptable standard for a vehicle whose entire visual identity is built around looking friendly.
Bburago, the Italian manufacturer and longtime Fiat licensee, produced versions of the third-generation 500 platform at 1:43, though their specific 500e releases require verification against current inventory records, as the Bureau's filing system experienced an incident in 2022 that we are not at liberty to discuss. White Box and similar budget-tier producers also entered this space, generally at lower tooling quality.
The 500e was produced at 1:64 scale by various manufacturers including Majorette, making it accessible to Hot Wheels-adjacent collectors, though the Bureau firmly holds that 1:64 representations of electric vehicles lose critical charging-port detail and should be considered supplementary documentation only. No confirmed 1:18 scale production of the 500e has been recorded in Bureau files at time of publication.
The 500e occupies a specific and growing collector niche: early production electric vehicles rendered in diecast at a time when manufacturers were still uncertain whether EVs warranted the tooling investment. This scarcity of serious production effort paradoxically increases interest from collectors who track automotive history through miniatures.
Color accuracy is the primary value driver for this model. The 500e was sold in a range of vibrant two-tone configurations — including Azzurro Elettrico (Electric Blue), which was exclusive to the 500e and does not appear on combustion-engine variants. A diecast example correctly rendered in this color with a contrasting white roof commands a meaningful premium over generic white or red examples.
The Bureau requires that a collectible-grade example retain intact wheel detail, undamaged door mirror castings, and legible "500e" badging where present. The charging port cover on the driver's side front quarter panel — a feature unique to this variant — should be visually distinct from combustion-engine 500 castings; its absence or misrepresentation constitutes grounds for filing a Variant Misclassification Complaint with this office.
Original packaging increases value by an estimated 15 to 25 percent depending on manufacturer. Norev window boxes in particular are considered complete documentation of provenance and should not be discarded under any circumstances, a directive the Bureau has issued seventeen times and which continues to be ignored.
The 500e has no significant motorsport history, a fact the Bureau records without judgment and without the slightest suggestion that this affects its standing in our files. It does, however, have a notable presence in urban fleet and rideshare contexts in California, which technically makes it one of the more-driven small EVs of its generation.
The vehicle appeared in various California-focused media productions during the mid-2010s as a background and featured prop, serving as visual shorthand for environmentally conscious characters of ambiguous income. The Bureau does not issue collectibility ratings based on television prop appearances but acknowledges the inquiries have been numerous.
Collectors should be aware that the standard Fiat 500 and the 500e share identical exterior bodywork and are frequently mislabeled in secondary market listings. The Bureau has issued cease-and-desist notices to no fewer than four online auction platforms regarding this matter. All four platforms have continued operations without apparent adjustment.
Bureau Notice · Form ASSMRB-SEO-7
This vehicle is currently under Bureau review.
Photographic evidence has been submitted. Classification is pending rebuttal.
All Bureau classifications are automated and frequently, spectacularly wrong. That is the point.